The text discusses the ongoing conflict between the auditor-general of Cyprus, Odysseas Michaelides, and the attorney-general’s office, led by Giorgos Savvides. The main facts presented in the text are:
1. Auditor-General Odysseas Michaelides has called for an end to the dual role of the attorney-general’s office as both advisor of the state and state prosecutor, a recommendation also made by the European Commission.
2. The European Commission’s Rule of Law report from July 2023 echoed concerns by the Council of Europe’s Group of States against Corruption (Greco) from 2016 about the risk of improper influence due to the integrated role of the prosecution service within the Law Office.
3. A draft law to reform the attorney-general’s office was submitted to the House in April but did not address the separation of the advisory and prosecutorial roles. Instead, it focused on salary alignment and the establishment of a prosecutorial council.
4. The Law Office has stated there are no plans to separate the two functions, as Greco did not expressly point out or imply the need for such a reform.
5. The Rule of Law report also highlighted concerns about the lack of review for decisions made by the attorney-general not to prosecute or to discontinue cases, a situation unique to Cyprus within the EU.
6. Akel deputy, Irene Charalambides, proposed an amendment to the constitution to limit the attorney-general’s power to decide against or suspend criminal prosecutions in the public interest.
7. The attorney-general recently halted a private criminal prosecution against a Russian oligarch, leading to public accusations of corruption, which the attorney-general denied without providing a full explanation.
8. The proposed constitutional amendment would require a two-thirds majority in the legislature to pass, which is considered unlikely due to lack of support from several parties.
Please note that the text contains opinions and rhetorical questions that are not factual information, such as speculations about the attorney-general’s motivations and the effectiveness of the legal service. These have been omitted from the summary.