{"id":5462,"date":"2024-03-26T03:00:44","date_gmt":"2024-03-26T01:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462"},"modified":"2024-03-26T03:00:44","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T01:00:44","slug":"sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462","title":{"rendered":"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate – The Sentinel"},"content":{"rendered":"

Corporate income taxes in Kansas would be reduced to 5.75%, and two business subsidies \u2014 Promoting Employment Across Kansas (PEAK) and High-Performance Incentive Program (H-PIP) \u2014 would be discontinued under the term of Senate Bill 546 discussed in the Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation.
\nRecipients of PEAK may retain or be refunded 95% of the\u00a0payroll withholding tax\u00a0of qualified employees for new jobs created in Kansas. Basic projects that create at least ten new jobs in metropolitan areas, or at least five new jobs in non-metropolitan areas, within two years may be eligible for up to seven years of payroll withholding tax savings.
\nBusinesses participating in H-PIP receive a 10% tax credit that is eligible for capital investment of at least $50,000 at the company\u2019s facility. In the five metro counties of Douglas, Johnson, Sedgwick, Shawnee and Wyandotte, the threshold is $1 million. The tax credit has a 16-year carryforward provided facilities are able to requalify for HPIP.
\nThe state\u2019s current corporate rate of 6.5%, the 21st<\/sup> highest in the nation according to The Tax Foundation, would be reduced to 6.5% this year, 6% in 2025 and 5.75% in 2026 under the legislation.<\/p>\n

Graphic courtesy of The Tax Foundation<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Testifying in support of the bill was Dave Trabert, CEO of the Kansas Policy Institute, owners of The Sentinel.<\/em> He told committee members research shows tax subsidies don\u2019t work for the economy or taxpayers:
\n\u201cA 2017 analysis by Nathan Jensen, then with Washington University at St. Louis and now with the University of Texas at Austin, found that there was little evidence that Kansas PEAK (Promoting Employment Across Kansas) recipients were no more likely to add jobs than non-PEAK recipients.
\n\u201cAccording to the Kansas City Star<\/em>, \u201cJensen has since authored the book, \u201cIncentives to Pander,\u201d exploring why politicians frequently over-incentivize business development. Generally, academic research has found that at least 75% of companies awarded incentives would have made a similar investment regardless of the public subsidy.\u00a0 Jensen says academics have long cited the border war here as a prime example of wasteful use of government incentives.\u201d
\n\u201cDr. Arthur Hall, Executive Director of the Brandmeyer Center for Applied Economics at the University of Kansas, examined STAR bond projects in Wichita in a study sponsored by Kansas Policy Institute.
\n\u201cHe concluded that the projects merely shifted economic activity from one part of the city to another.
\n\u201cSubsidies benefit the few recipients and the elected officials who promote them, but they often come at the expense of others. Retailers in one part of a city lose business when economic activity is shifted to another part of the city, for example.\u201d
\nTrabert cited research showing corporate tax cuts are a more efficient incentive for economic benefit and job growth:
\n\u201cA research paper published by the Economic Research Center at The Buckeye Institute and Kansas Policy Institute used Buckeye\u2019s STELA (state tax and economic long-run analysis) model to compare the economic impact of a $500 million tax cut in corporate income tax, the personal income tax, and state sales tax. STELA can be calibrated to each state\u2019s economy:\u201d<\/p>\n

Jonathan Leuth of Americans for Prosperity \u2013 Kansas (AFP-KS) joined in support of the bill:
\n\u201cWe\u2019re (Kansas) the 8th<\/sup>-most moved-out-of state in the country, and we\u2019re looking at what our neighboring states are doing; they are tackling tax reform, both on the corporate and personal level. We have an opportunity to do that; remain competitive, and be one of the most competitive places in the region.\u201d
\nThe comments from Leuth brought on an exchange with Sen. Tom Holland:<\/p>\n

Photo of Sen. Holland courtesy of Kansas Legislature<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Sen. Holland: \u201cDo you support at all the concept of having a Commerce Department where they can do targeted economic development; yes or no?
\nLeuth: \u201cDefining targeted economic development incentives, I think, would be needed, but we could certainly have a conversation about how to best create an environment that is economically feasible for new and current investments.\u201d
\nSen. Holland: \u201cIf I\u2019m a start-up\u2026 if I\u2019m a business looking to come into Kansas\u2026 if I have to make extensive capital investments to get my plant up and going\u2026how is lowering the corporate income tax rate going to help me do that, versus having the H-PIP program?\u201d
\nLeuth: \u201cI think continuing to improve the overall business environment is one step as part of that comprehensive reform that would need to happen in Kansas.\u201d
\nSen. Holland: \u201cWhen you support this bill, is that your mission; \u2018let\u2019s get it (corporate tax rate) as low as we can and the economic development incentives, that\u2019s more a secondary issue, it\u2019s just not that important\u2019?\u201d
\nLeuth: \u201cWe (AFP-KS) have a standing history opposing a lot of the economic development credit programs. We\u2019ve never supported subsidizing business in that way. Our goal is to support pieces of legislation that are going to put us on a path to create a better business environment so that we\u2019re not ranked 26th<\/sup> or 28th<\/sup> for our business climate environment.\u201d
\nHolland didn\u2019t explain why he now supports tax subsidies after previously having been a vociferous opponent.
\nTim Henry, Chief Financial Officer of Great Plains Manufacturing and Kubota North America, explained his opposition to SB 546:
\n\u201cWe view this bill as detrimental to investment. We have made multi-year plans and commitments. If this bill passes, the company will lose millions of dollars of those incentives that we anticipated when that investment decision was made.
\n\u201cOur company took a facility that was going out of business and has now hired twice as many people as were there before. The company has on-shored production that used to be done in Japan and in China; some of that production is now being exported out of the United States. Our parent company decided to make another investment in Kansas for the research center for North America construction equipment, which is generating additional spending and additional jobs.\u201d<\/p>\n

Photo of Sen. Tyson courtesy of Kansas Legislature<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Committee Chair Caryn Tyson asked Henry:
\n\u201cThe program doesn\u2019t go away as to anybody that\u2019s currently in it. So, you anticipated receiving these credits? Which program are you referring to?\u201d
\nHenry: \u201cWe are participating in PEAK. We are in the third year of the PEAK contract of ten years. It sounds like that contract would still be retained. But on H-PIP, we file each year and you don\u2019t get the credit until those assets are put into service.\u201d
\nSam Sackett with Sprint AeroSystems sought a middle ground, seeing merit in both lowering the corporate tax rate and preserving the incentive programs:
\n\u201cThese two programs not only incentivize new jobs, they create a foundation for protecting existing Kansas jobs, including coveted manufacturing jobs. We support the committee\u2019s desire for a more competitive corporate tax rate and we think it\u2019s in the state\u2019s strategic interest to incentivize companies to invest capital in Kansas.\u201d
\nTo Mitch Robinson with the Kansas Economic Development Alliance, who also opposed the bill, Sen. Molly Baumgardner referred to a map showing Kansas counties participating in the H-PIP incentive program:<\/p>\n

Photo of Sen. Baumgardner courtesy of Kansas Legislature<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201c40% of our counties have never<\/em> participated in H-PIP. 18 counties that have, have only 1 H-PIP participant,\u201d she said referring to her district; that includes Johnson County with 111 H-PIP participants.
\n\u201cH-PIP participation is set at investments that exceed $1 million; those counties make up a majority of H-PIP. With the exception of Finney County, with seven H-PIP programs, there is not aggressive action from the Department of Commerce through these incentives to do anything for counties that have declining populations. This map illustrates it\u2019s not for all <\/em>Kansans; it\u2019s pockets\u201d
\nRobinson responded: It\u2019s unfortunate those rural counties don\u2019t have the industrial base to take advantage of it, and some places don\u2019t have the skill base.\u201d
\nChair Tyson summarized the exchange: \u201cThis is government picking winners and losers again; if we can get the income tax as low as possible, I think we can get it considerably lower.\u201d<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t<\/span> Post Views:<\/span> 0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Under Senate Bill 546, corporate income taxes in Kansas would be reduced to 5.75%, and two business subsidies – PEAK and H-PIP – would be discontinued. Recipients of PEAK may retain or be refunded 95% of the payroll withholding tax of qualified employees for new jobs created in Kansas. Businesses participating in H-PIP receive a 10% tax credit for capital investment. The state’s current corporate tax rate of 6.5% would be gradually reduced under the legislation. Testifying in support of the bill was Dave Trabert, CEO of the Kansas Policy Institute, who argued that tax subsidies do not work for the economy or taxpayers. Jonathan Leuth of Americans for Prosperity – Kansas supported the bill, emphasizing the need for tax reform to remain competitive. Tim Henry, CFO of Great Plains Manufacturing and Kubota North America, opposed the bill, stating it would be detrimental to investment. Sam Sackett with Sprint AeroSystems saw merit in both lowering the corporate tax rate and preserving incentive programs. Mitch Robinson with the Kansas Economic Development Alliance also opposed the bill, highlighting disparities in H-PIP participation across counties.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":5463,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1521,186,3394,486,33,1625,3393,3395,26,27,203,1610,415,658,2294,899,2753,2042,28,2685,3138,1832,1358,1065,3358,1183,544,380,293],"class_list":["post-5462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-other","tag-1521","tag-business","tag-business-subsidies","tag-china","tag-companies","tag-construction","tag-corporate-income-taxes","tag-economic-development","tag-economy","tag-employment","tag-environment","tag-evidence","tag-government","tag-history","tag-income","tag-interest","tag-investment","tag-japan","tag-jobs","tag-legislation","tag-performance","tag-subsidies","tag-support","tag-tax","tag-tax-cuts","tag-taxes","tag-united-states","tag-us","tag-war"],"acf":{"keyphrase":"","keywords":"","sourceimg":"","country-category":""},"yoast_head":"\nSB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate - The Sentinel<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"tax subsidies. corporate income taxes, business subsidies, economic development\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate - The Sentinel\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"tax subsidies. corporate income taxes, business subsidies, economic development\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ch.jfdi.cc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-26T01:00:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"559\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Robot\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Robot\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Robot\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/24aeef359ef2df73056e7502e1cadc71\"},\"headline\":\"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate – The Sentinel\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-26T01:00:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462\"},\"wordCount\":1344,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png\",\"keywords\":[\"000\",\"Business\",\"business subsidies\",\"china\",\"Companies\",\"construction\",\"corporate income taxes\",\"economic development\",\"Economy\",\"employment\",\"Environment\",\"evidence\",\"government\",\"history\",\"income\",\"interest\",\"investment\",\"japan\",\"jobs\",\"legislation\",\"performance\",\"subsidies\",\"support\",\"tax\",\"tax cuts\",\"taxes\",\"United States\",\"US\",\"war\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Other\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462\",\"name\":\"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate - The Sentinel\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-26T01:00:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/24aeef359ef2df73056e7502e1cadc71\"},\"description\":\"tax subsidies. corporate income taxes, business subsidies, economic development\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":559,\"caption\":\"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate - The Sentinel\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?p=5462#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate – The Sentinel\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/\",\"name\":\"ch.jfdi.cc\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/24aeef359ef2df73056e7502e1cadc71\",\"name\":\"Robot\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ch.jfdi.cc\\\/?author=6\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate - The Sentinel","description":"tax subsidies. corporate income taxes, business subsidies, economic development","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate - The Sentinel","og_description":"tax subsidies. corporate income taxes, business subsidies, economic development","og_url":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462","og_site_name":"ch.jfdi.cc","article_published_time":"2024-03-26T01:00:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":559,"url":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Robot","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Robot","Estimated reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462"},"author":{"name":"Robot","@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/#\/schema\/person\/24aeef359ef2df73056e7502e1cadc71"},"headline":"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate – The Sentinel","datePublished":"2024-03-26T01:00:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462"},"wordCount":1344,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png","keywords":["000","Business","business subsidies","china","Companies","construction","corporate income taxes","economic development","Economy","employment","Environment","evidence","government","history","income","interest","investment","japan","jobs","legislation","performance","subsidies","support","tax","tax cuts","taxes","United States","US","war"],"articleSection":["Other"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462","url":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462","name":"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate - The Sentinel","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png","datePublished":"2024-03-26T01:00:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/#\/schema\/person\/24aeef359ef2df73056e7502e1cadc71"},"description":"tax subsidies. corporate income taxes, business subsidies, economic development","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/sb-546-would-end-two-business-subsidies-cut-corporate-tax-rate-the-sentinel.png","width":1200,"height":559,"caption":"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate - The Sentinel"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?p=5462#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SB 546 would end two business subsidies, cut corporate tax rate – The Sentinel"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/","name":"ch.jfdi.cc","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/#\/schema\/person\/24aeef359ef2df73056e7502e1cadc71","name":"Robot","url":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/?author=6"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5462\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/5463"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ch.jfdi.cc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}