To many Americans, the 2024 election is an unwelcome contest between the felonious and the frail. Voters hear democracy is at risk, which is true but is also another potential reason for disillusionment.Yet the stakes of their choice for the basic public policies that shape their lives are huge, if less discussed.Nowhere is this truer than when it comes to taxes. Whoever wins in 2024, the United States is on course for the biggest, most consequential debate over future policy priorities since the Great Recession: Should the enormous, ineffective and inequality-abetting tax cuts that Donald Trump signed into law in 2017 be extended past their scheduled expiration in 2025? And should the permanent corporate tax cuts in that bill be kept in place even as it has become clear how little these business goodies have done for the economy?This is a choice between two fundamentally different visions for our country. If the Trump tax cuts are extended \u2014 which Steve Scalise, the Republican House majority leader, recently said he would seek to do in the first one hundred days of a second Trump term \u2014 and the corporate tax reductions left undisturbed, our elected leaders will have locked in place priorities that a large majority of Americans say they oppose. Worse, the Trump tax package will exacerbate a fiscal crisis for programs like Social Security and Medicare that are highly popular, including among Republicans.To understand the stakes, we must go back to Mr. Trump\u2019s first year in office. Republicans had one big legislative accomplishment: the tax cut bill they squeaked through after barely failing to repeal the Affordable Care Act. The tax cuts were among the least popular major legislation Congress had considered in a generation.To mask its price tag and comply with budget rules, architects of the bill, like Paul Ryan, the former House speaker, designed it like an exploding mortgage. The most unpopular part \u2014 a massive cut in corporate taxes \u2014 was made permanent. Most of the rest was set to expire in 2025, just when a newly elected president and Congress entered office. The idea was that these tax cuts for American households would be politically impossible to reverse. As Mr. Ryan explained after leaving Congress, \u201cWe made temporary what we thought could get extended; we made permanent what we thought might not get extended that we wanted to stay permanent.\u201dWe are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.<\/p>\n
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and\u00a0log into\u00a0your Times account, or\u00a0subscribe\u00a0for all of The Times.<\/p>\n
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber?\u00a0Log in.Want all of The Times?\u00a0Subscribe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The 2024 election will involve a debate over whether to extend the tax cuts signed into law by Donald Trump in 2017, particularly the corporate tax cuts. If the tax cuts are extended, it could exacerbate a fiscal crisis for programs like Social Security and Medicare. The tax cuts were among the least popular major legislation Congress had considered in a generation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":13755,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[6552,5800,3492,1766,186,10898,1240,6196,4498,6064,3399,5255,10802,1810,6113,166,26,1600,5317,4081,9046,959,5679,3940,2685,7154,4593,634,5821,1500,4833,4843,5838,3886,1022,1005,720,4054,827,7155,1065,9076,3358,4066,1183,841,8514,544,1379],"class_list":["post-13754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-other","tag-access","tag-americans","tag-bill","tag-budget","tag-business","tag-choice","tag-clear","tag-congress","tag-corporate-tax","tag-corporate-tax-cuts","tag-corporate-taxes","tag-crisis","tag-debate","tag-democracy","tag-disillusionment","tag-donald-trump","tag-economy","tag-election","tag-former-house-speaker","tag-future","tag-house","tag-inequality","tag-law","tag-leaders","tag-legislation","tag-medicare","tag-office","tag-opinion","tag-package","tag-patience","tag-policy","tag-president","tag-price","tag-recession","tag-republican","tag-republicans","tag-rest","tag-risk","tag-security","tag-social-security","tag-tax","tag-tax-cut","tag-tax-cuts","tag-tax-reductions","tag-taxes","tag-trump","tag-trump-tax-cuts","tag-united-states","tag-voters"],"acf":{"keyphrase":"","keywords":"","sourceimg":"","country-category":""},"yoast_head":"\n